Is the Safe Withdrawal Rate safe? What are the risks of the Self Withdrawal Rate strategy?
If you look at the financial independence/early retirement (FIRE) community, about 98% of them are following only 2 strategies to reach FI:
- invest in index funds until they reach a specific level of invested money that allows them to live off the 4% safe withdrawal rate forever.
- Or buy stocks/funds that pay them enough dividends to cover their expenses
For those who are not familiar with these concepts, here’s a quick summary: past stock market trends show us that the market grows on average by about 8% every year. They assume that inflation will be about 4% on average. So, if your total expenses are, let’s say 25K (euros or dollars) per year than you need to have about 625K invested in index funds or ETFs (25K is 4% of 625K). *
If the market grows by 8%, you subtract 4% for inflation, withdraw 4% a year for your expenses (by selling some of your funds), and you end up not losing any of your money. You do that every year.
Obviously these are average numbers but basically, in a nutshell this is the 4% rule (safe withdrawal rate / SWR).
If all goes well (your costs don’t go up, and you believe that past market trends will continue) you never have to work again. Sounds great, doesn’t it? You just need to save up 625K. Factor in some side hustles, bit of luck, maybe inheritance, some good stock market years plus compounding … and it’s perfectly achievable for a couple within 10 years.
Nice, simple, logical and achievable. Isn’t it? So where’s the problem?
I think that this strategy is based on factors and assumptions that we have no control over. It can work, but it can also fail.
Why I don’t believe in the 4% rule or the index fund strategy:
1. It’s based on past trends. This strategy is based on how the stock market developed in the past. Over the last 40 years, technological progress has been astronomical. While we should learn from the past, I don’t think that these trends will necessarily continue. They might do, I just simply can’t be sure enough.
2. The market is not predictable. Nobody, even expert investors, can predict how a stock will perform. There are so many variables that this is simply impossible. Ok, you might have some insider information. In which case, congratulations! You can be lucky. But just like you can’t predict the performance of a stock or fund, you can’t predict the whole market’s performance.
We don’t know how long the next crash will last. Yes, we’ve seen that the market always goes up. After a crash, quite quickly the market recovers and ends up higher than before. But how do we know how long it will take to recover from the next crash? Will it take 2-3 years or 20-30 years? If you base your retirement on the 4% SWR, you’re in big trouble if the market doesn’t recover in 20-30 years!
3. The stock market is just ONE entity. We hear that all the time: “diversify your investments”, “don’t put all your eggs in one basket”. We also know that investing in an index fund means investing in hundreds, thousands of different businesses. Real businesses. If a dozen go bankrupt who cares? Right? You cannot possibly lose all your money, right? Well, I think that the stock market (or an index fund for that matter) as a whole can be seen as a single entity and its crashes and trends don’t follow real life. We’ve seen that in past crashes too: even though most of the companies in an index did pretty well in real life, sometimes the overall index lost more than half of it’s value.
It’s very unlikely that companies like Coca Cola, McDonalds, GE, Chrysler etc. will suddenly go bankrupt at the same time. But I think there’s a good chance that at some point people will simply stop believing in the stock market and rush to get out.
Who can guarantee that we’re going to have a stock market in its current form in 5, 20 or 30 years? Is it that unthinkable that, with the next crash and panic exits the stock market will stop existing? Maybe a new system will replace it… we don’t know.
The stock market only exists because investors believe that it represents real businesses. But what if they lose faith in it?
4. Legislation can mess up SWR strategy. A few years ago Germany introduced a tax of 25% on capital gain income. So basically over here, all the money we make from dividends, interest, trading stocks, ETFs or other funds is suddenly taxed at 25% (ok, you have €800 per year tax free per person). Now, this tax alone makes it a lot more difficult to plan your early retirement on this sort of income. You have to either have a much better ROI or much more invested money to apply the 4% retrieval rate or maybe apply a lower SWR. At the same time tax rate on other income varies progressively between 0-45%. In fact as a family of 4 you could have 30K of income without being taxed at all! The US does not have such high capital gains taxes but how can you be sure that in the coming years this won’t change?
5. And there’s the inflation thing. Western countries have accumulated impressive amounts of debt in the past decades. Do you know how long this is going to last without any consequences? I don’t. Nobody does! Not even politicians. Nobody has a plan for solving this problem. I haven’t even heard anyone putting forward any potential solutions. Just nobody talks about it. Interesting… High inflation is one way of dealing with the situation. What are the consequences? How would you feel if your money lost 50% of its value over night? Is that impossible? In Romania, where I come from, we had 150% inflation not so long ago (1997). That is a crazy number! Do you think this is impossible in the US or EU? It’s worth thinking about.
These things sometimes depend on political decisions and can have a huge impact on our finances. If you’re not prepared, you could be in for some ugly surprises.
6.The 4% SWR could turn off your brain. Yes: actually turn off your brain :). What I mean is that some people applying the SWR strategy could switch to autopilot blindly believing in it and having no plan B. Although, to be fair, I am sure that most early retirees are flexible and smart enough to react to ugly scenarios.
7. Going the hard way makes you stronger and safer. Following the SWR strategy is the easy way. It’s easy to follow, you don’t need to think that much about investments. Just save as much as you can and pay into some index funds and at some point…BANG! you reach FI. When you build up a business, think about other types of investments, things get more complicated. They do, but that’s exactly what you need to learn. And all that experience and knowledge makes you stronger and better prepared for the future. It’s the hard way, but it’s worth it.
8. You need too much money. Too much. For many people could be very difficult to save enough money to reach FI with the SWR. FI can be reached with a lot less money than 625K. But it’s harder. You need to work more and try things out. For a fraction of that money you could put down the equity for several rental apartments, furnish them and rent them with Airbnb. It’s not 100% passive, but after you made enough money on them and paid them off, you can rent it long term. It’s not easy, but you learn a lot and … make nice money, lot quicker. You could invest no money, only time and build up your online business (see 4 hours work week by Tim Ferriss) and generate passive income like that. Or, you can just do a combination of all these and still end up paying a lot less than you need for the 4%SWR strategy.
So what now?
I am not saying that the SWR strategy is completely wrong. It’s far better than doing nothing or stock picking. People who set financial independence as a goal are smart. They do some research, think, are frugal and don’t spend most their money on bullshit. That’s good news! But, I strongly believe, you should have a mixed strategy. I want you to USE your brain and diversify your investments. Don’t limit your strategy to stocks/bonds/index funds etc, but look into real estate, land, startups you believe in, maybe precious metals and, most importantly your own business! Stuff that you create, grow, understand, have control over and provide you with fairly passive income.
Still, this post is not an anti-SWR post. This strategy is good and many smarter people than I (see footnote) did some serious research on it that you should definitely check out. It also is a strategy that you can start right away. You don’t have to wait, do much research on or so.
All I am saying is: it relies 100% on the market and I would not put ALL my money in something that I:
– cannot control
– don’t fully understand
– can’t predict
– very volatile
– can drop a huge amount within days and hours
– it’s based only on past trends
The keyword is: DIVERSIFY!
– the safe withdrawal rate cannot predict the future. It’s based on the past.
– in my opinion, it’s worth having more control rather than 100% passive income.
– the SWR is good but as part of a strategy and not as the only strategy.
– Diversify to be independent of the stock market.
* if you want to learn more about the SWR
– @madfientist wrote a great post about the SWR that you should check out here.
– Also: don’t invest in the stock market in ANY way before you didn’t read Jim Collins’ Stock Series over here.
-Jakob wrote a very good book about it: earlyretirementextreme.com/.
-And of course you should read what MrMoneyMustache writes about it here.
These people are all legends! Event though I only agree with them 99% 🙂